Linked with AntiWar.com, with JPRI The Japan Policy Research Institute; with about Chalmers Johnson’s “Nemesis »-book, with Iraqi Wars – (or how to end it?), and with his presentation of February 19, 2006.
Chalmers Ashby Johnson is an author and professor emeritus of the University of California, San Diego. He is also president and co-founder of the Japan Policy Research Institute, an organization promoting public education about Japan and Asia. He has written numerous books including, most recently, three examinations of the consequences of American Empire. (full text).
Read: Empire v. Democracy, Why Nemesis Is at Our Door, February 1, 2007.
He says: ”In early 2003, on the eve of the invasion of Iraq, I was putting the finishing touches on my portrait [The Sorrows of Empire] of the global reach of American military bases. In it, I suggested the sorrows already invading our lives, which were likely to be our fate for years to come: perpetual war, a collapse of constitutional government, endemic official lying and disinformation, and finally bankruptcy. At book’s end, I advocated reforms intended to head off these outcomes but warned that ‘failing such a reform, Nemesis, the goddess of retribution and vengeance, the punisher of pride and hubris, waits impatiently for her meeting with us » … (full text).
Read: Cold Warrior in a Strange Land, March 22, 2006.
Chalmers Johnson – USA
He works for the Japan Policy Research Institute JPRI.
Read: Republic or empire: A National Intelligence Estimate on the United States, January 2007.
Listen to his longer interview on AntiWarRadio (February 5, 2007).
See his blog: The American Empire Project.
He says also: « By the end of the first century BC, Rome had seemingly, again, « inadvertently » acquired an empire that surrounded the entire Mediterranean Sea. They then discovered that the inescapable accompaniment, the Siamese twin of imperialism, is militarism. You start needing standing armies. You start having armies that are demobilized, of men who have done nothing but spend all their lives in the military. It’s expensive to pay them. You have to now provide them, in the Roman Empire, with farms or things of this sort. They become irritated with the state. And then along comes the military populist, the figure who says, « I understand your problems. I represent your interests against the Roman Senate. » And, certainly, Julius Caesar is the model for this. « The only requirement is that I become life dictator for this » — Napoleon Bonaparte, Juan Peron, this type of figure.